dc.contributor.author |
Cay, Mahmut |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cetin, Aymelek |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ates, Mustafa |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Koleli, Isil |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Senol, Deniz |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kose, Evren |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ozgor, Dincer |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Simsek, Arife |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ozbag, Davut |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-07-23T06:08:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-07-23T06:08:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Cay, M. Cetin, A . Ates, M. Koleli, I. Senol, D. Kose, E. Ozgor, D. Simsek, A.Ozbag, D.(2018). The evaluation of the effect of vaginal delivery and aging on anal sphincteranatomy and function(2018). Cilt:47. Sayı:7. 309-315 ss. |
tr_TR |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11616/12852 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Objective. - This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of vaginal delivery and aging on anal sphincter anatomy and function.
Method. - Asymptomatic thirty women were included in this prospective study. Group 1 included 10 women (age range: 18-50) who had never been pregnant. Group 2 included 10 women (age range: 18-50) who had vaginal delivery. Group 3 included 10 women over 50 who had vaginal delivery.
Results. - There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of resting and squeeze pressures. It was found that sphincter thickness showed statistically significant difference between the group 1 and group 3, and also group 2 and group 3. There was not statistically significant difference between the group 1 and group 2 in terms of sphincter thickness. There was a positive correlation between the age and sphincter thickness in all groups. In terms of sphincter thickness and pressure findings there was a positive correlation between the squeeze pressure and external anal sphincter thickness only in group 3.
Conclusion. - The vaginal delivery did not have a negative influence on the structure and function of the anal sphincter in asymptomatic women. However, it was found that anal sphincter thickness changed strongly in a positive manner with aging. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
tr_TR |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
tr_TR |
dc.publisher |
Elsevıer masson, corporatıon offıce, 65 camılle desmoulıns cs50083 ıssy-les-moulıneaux, 92442 parıs, france |
tr_TR |
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.05.013 |
tr_TR |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
tr_TR |
dc.subject |
Anorectal manometry |
tr_TR |
dc.subject |
endosonography |
tr_TR |
dc.subject |
age |
tr_TR |
dc.subject |
complex |
tr_TR |
dc.subject |
ınjury |
tr_TR |
dc.subject |
sex |
tr_TR |
dc.title |
The evaluation of the effect of vaginal delivery and aging on anal sphincteranatomy and function |
tr_TR |
dc.type |
article |
tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal |
Journal of gynecology obstetrıcs and human reproductıon |
tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department |
İnönü Üniversitesi |
tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume |
47 |
tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue |
7 |
tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage |
309 |
tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage |
315 |
tr_TR |