DSpace@İnönü

The effect of intracameral bevacizumab on current hyphema

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Polat, Nihat
dc.contributor.author Ozkan, Ahmet Selim
dc.contributor.author Parlakpınar, Hakan
dc.contributor.author Akpolat, Nusret
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-27T15:02:22Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-27T15:02:22Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation POLAT N,ÖZKAN A. S,AKBAŞ S,PARLAKPINAR H,AKPOLAT N (2019). The effect of intracameral bevacizumab on current hyphema. Annals of Medical Research, 26(5), 845 - 849. Doi: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.01.05 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpFMk16a3dNQT09/the-effect-of-intracameral-bevacizumab-on-current-hyphema
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/44568
dc.description.abstract Abstract:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intracameral bevacizumab on the current hyphema.Material and Methods: The animals were assigned to the following 4 groups; Group 1: One 2.5 mg bevacizumab injection to theanterior chamber; Group 2: One 1.25 mg bevacizumab injection to the anterior chamber; Group 3: One 1cc balanced salt solutioninjection to the anterior chamber; and Group 4: Untreated hyphema group. Non-heparinized blood that obtained from the rabbit earwas used to fill the anterior chamber to create total hyphema. Intraocular pressures (IOP), hyphema resorption time, clot formation,peripheral synechia formation, and corneal staining were recorded.Results: IOP results were 26±1.2, 30±2.1, 24±2.9, and 22±0.0 mm Hg for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were significantlyhigher in group 2 than in the other groups (p= 0.001). Resorption times of hyphema were 13±2.2, 13±3.2, 9±1.7, and 9±1.6 days forgroups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were significantly longer for the groups receiving bevacizumab than for the others (p=0.018).The clot formation scores were 0.16±0.41, 0.14±0.38, 0.86±0.38, and 1.0±0.0 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and weresignificantly lower for the groups receiving bevacizumab than in the other groups (p= 0.002). The peripheral synechia formationscores were 0.0±0.0, 0.0±0.0, 0.43±0.53, and 0.50±0.54 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were not significantly different (p=0.213). The corneal staining scores were 0.85±0.35, 0.86±0.38, 0.14±0.38, and 0.14±0.38 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, andwere significantly higher for the groups receiving bevacizumab (p= 0.035).Conclusion: Intracameral bevacizumab may increase complications that related current hyphema. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title The effect of intracameral bevacizumab on current hyphema en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Annals of Medical Research en_US
dc.department İnönü Üniversitesi en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster