DSpace@İnönü

Comparison of subclinical neuronal injury by measuring neuron-specific enolase in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement or sutureless aortic valve replacement

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Ahmet Seyda
dc.contributor.author Kahraman, Fatih
dc.contributor.author Erkan, Hakan
dc.contributor.author Korkmaz, Levent
dc.contributor.author Akyuz, Ali Rıza
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-16T16:38:29Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-16T16:38:29Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Seyda Yilmaz, A., Kahraman, F., Erkan, H., Korkmaz, L., & Riza Akyuz, A. (2021). Comparison of subclinical neuronal injury by measuring neuron-specific enolase in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement or sutureless aortic valve replacement . Annals of Medical Research en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/56224
dc.description.abstract Aim: Severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) which causes angina pectoris, syncope, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, may be treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR). We aimed to predict subclinical neuronal injury (SNI) by measuring neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients who underwent the TAVR and the SU-AVR.Materials and Methods: This clinical trial was carried out between January 2015 and January 2017. A total of 53 patients who had severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) and underwent TAVR and SU-AVR were included. The Serum NSE level was measured just before and 24 hours after the procedure. Demographic variables, neurologic assessment findings, clinical and echocardiographic data, carotid ultrasounds reports, and laboratory findings were recorded.Results: A total of 53 patients were included the study. The mean age was 78.4±8.6 and 20 were man (37.7%). The mean age of the TAVR group was significantly higher than the SU-AVR group (82.9±4.7 vs 71.5±8.7, p0.001). The NSE level was significantly higher in the SUAVR group compared to the TAVR group after the procedure (21.15±10.25 vs 35.32±12.64, p0.001). Differences between before and after the procedure the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), demographic and echocardiographic variables were similar between the two groups.Conclusion: Serum NSE level was significantly higher in the SU-AVR group than the TAVR group Therefore, we may consider the SNI rate is higher as well. In patients who are at higher risk for neurological damage or have neurologic disease, TAVR may be a better treatment option instead of SUAVR. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Comparison of subclinical neuronal injury by measuring neuron-specific enolase in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement or sutureless aortic valve replacement en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal Annals of Medical Research en_US
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster