DSpace@İnönü

A comparison of crystal phenol treatment, midline primary closure and limberg flap reconstruction methods in female patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Kanlioz, M.
dc.contributor.author Uyanikoglu, H.
dc.contributor.author Ekici, U.
dc.contributor.author Karatas, T.
dc.contributor.author Tatli, F.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-06T12:49:55Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-06T12:49:55Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.issn 0003469X (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/71575
dc.description.abstract Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic problem often occurs in healthy hirsute men, however, women may also be affected. A range of conservative techniques to surgical flaps have been used to treat this condition. Currently, midline primary closure (MPC) is considered the standard of therapy; however, no statistically significant difference has been noted between primary versus secondary (Karydakis flap or Limberg flap) closure. Recently, flap reconstruction methods have been applied and superiority of these methods have been shown. Treatment methods should be employed to the individual, taking into account recurrence and complication rates of the method, recovery time, patients’ preference and surgeon’s skill. © 2021, Edizioni Luigi Pozzi. All rights reserved.
dc.source Annali Italiani di Chirurgia
dc.title A comparison of crystal phenol treatment, midline primary closure and limberg flap reconstruction methods in female patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Dosyalar Boyut Biçim Göster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster