DSpace@İnönü

A randomized trial comparing the short binasal prong to the RAM cannula for noninvasive ventilation support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Gokce, I.K.
dc.contributor.author Kaya, H.
dc.contributor.author Ozdemir, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-06T12:50:54Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-06T12:50:54Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.issn 14767058 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/71965
dc.description.abstract Purpose: In this study, we compared the efficacy of the RAM cannula and the short binasal prong (SBP) as noninvasive ventilation (NIV) interfaces in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Materials and Methods: Premature infants with RDS who required NIV were randomized in the RAM cannula and SBP groups within the first half hour. The groups were compared in terms of their need for invasive ventilation, their surfactant use, and their morbidities. Results: We assessed 126 patients (62 SBPs and 64 RAM cannulas). Clinical and demographic features of the groups were similar. Within the first 72 hours, the RAM cannula group showed a higher need for invasive ventilation (32.8 and 9.6%, p =.002, respectively), surfactant (42.1 and 19.3%, p =.007, respectively), and rate of pulmonary hemorrhage was also higher. There were no differences between the groups in terms of other morbidities. Conclusions: In preterm infants with RDS, RAM cannula use as an interface for NIV results in increased invasive ventilation and surfactant use. © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.source Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
dc.title A randomized trial comparing the short binasal prong to the RAM cannula for noninvasive ventilation support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Dosyalar Boyut Biçim Göster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster