DSpace Repository

Clinical and Pathologic Features of Patients with Rare Ovarian Tumors:

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bilici, A
dc.contributor.author Inanc, M
dc.contributor.author Ulas, A
dc.contributor.author Akman, T
dc.contributor.author Seker, M
dc.contributor.author Babacan, NA
dc.contributor.author Inal, A
dc.contributor.author Bal, O
dc.contributor.author Koral, L
dc.contributor.author Sevinc, A
dc.contributor.author Tufan, G
dc.contributor.author Elkiran, ET
dc.contributor.author Ustaalioglu, BBO
dc.contributor.author Yavuzsen, T
dc.contributor.author Alkis, N
dc.contributor.author Ozkan, M
dc.contributor.author Gumus, M
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-13T12:37:03Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-13T12:37:03Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/80691
dc.description.abstract Background: Non-epithelial malignant ovarian tumors and clear cell carcinomas, Brenner tumors, transitional cell tumors, and carcinoid tumors of the ovary are rare ovarian tumors (ROTs). In this study, our aim was to determine the clinicopathological features of ROT patients and prognostic factors associated with survival. Materials and Methods: A total of 167 patients with ROT who underwent initial surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic factors that may influence the survival of patients were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Of 167 patients, 75 (44.9%) were diagnosed with germ-cell tumors (GCT) and 68 (40.7%) with sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST); the remaining 24 had other rare ovarian histologies. Significant differences were found between ROT groups with respect to age at diagnosis, tumor localization, initial surgery type, tumor size, tumor grade, and FIGO stage. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates and median PFS intervals for patients with other ROT were worse than those of patients with GCT and SCST (41.8% vs 79.6% vs 77.1% and 30.2 vs 72 vs 150 months, respectively; p=0.01). Moreover, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates and median OS times for patients with both GCT and SCST were better as compared to patients with other ROT, but these differences were not statistically significant (87.7% vs 88.8% vs 73.9% and 170 vs 122 vs 91 months, respectively; p=0.20). In the univariate analysis, tumor localization (p<0.001), FIGO stage (p<0.001), and tumor grade (p=0.04) were significant prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, the univariate analysis indicated that tumor localization (p=0.01), FIGO stage (p=0.001), and recurrence (p<0.001) were important prognostic indicators. Multivariate analysis showed that FIGO stage for PFS (p=0.001, HR: 0.11) and the presence of recurrence (p=0.02, HR: 0.54) for OS were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: ROTs should be evaluated separately from epithelial ovarian cancers because of their different biological features and natural history. Due to the rarity of these tumors, determination of relevant prognostic factors as a group may help as a guide for more appropriate adjuvant or recurrent therapies for ROTs.
dc.description.abstract C1 [Bilici, Ahmet] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Inanc, Mevlude; Ozkan, Metin] Dr Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Educ & Res Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Ulas, Arife; Bal, Oznur; Alkis, Necati] Erciyes Univ, Fac Med, Kayseri, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Seker, Mesut; Ustaalioglu, Bala Basak Oven] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Babacan, Nalan Akgul] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Inal, Ali] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Koral, Lokman] Dicle Univ, Fac Med, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Sevinc, Alper] Selcuk Univ, Meram Med Fac, Konya, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Tufan, Gulnihal] Gaziantep Univ, Med Fac, Gaziantep, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Elkiran, Emin Tamer] Inonu Univ, Fac Med, Malatya, Turkey.
dc.source ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
dc.title Clinical and Pathologic Features of Patients with Rare Ovarian Tumors:
dc.title Multi-Center Review of 167 Patients by the Anatolian Society of Medical
dc.title Oncology


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record