DSpace@İnönü

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Sarici, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Erkurt, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.author Kuku, Irfan
dc.contributor.author Bahçecioğlu, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.author Gok, Selim
dc.contributor.author Bicim, Soykan
dc.contributor.author Kaya, Emin
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-16T10:35:16Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-16T10:35:16Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation SARICI A, ERKURT M, KUKU İ, BAHÇECİOĞLU Ö, GÖK S, BİÇİM S, KAYA E (2021). Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Medicine Science, 10(4), 1133 - 1137. 10.5455/medscience.2021.03.083 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/504462/comparison-of-efficacy-and-toxicity-of-treosulfan-fludarabine-and-busulfancyclophosphamide-conditioning-regimens-in-patients-undergoing-allogeneic-stem-cell-transplantation
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/85807
dc.description.abstract In hematologic malignancy patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, the optimal conditioning regimen is uncertain and comparative studies of conditioning regimens with each other are needed. In the current study, it was intended to compare the toxicity profile of two myeloablative conditioning regimens (treosulfan-fludarabine vs busulfan-cyclophosphamide) and their effects on clinical outcomes. The data of patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 2015 and 2020 in Inonu University Turgut Ozal Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving treosulfan-fludarabine (treosulfan group) or busulfan-cyclophosphamide (busulfan group) as a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic HSCT were matched 1:1 according to their disease and age. A total of 42 patients were included in this trial (busulfan:21, treosulfan:21). The mean age of the patients was 45.2±14 years, and regimen-related toxicities and clinical outcomes of both groups were similar (all p>0.05). The median follow-up time of the patients in the treosulfan regimen groups was 9 months, while it was 15 months in the busulfan regimen group (p=0.82). 54.8% of the patients (12 treosulfan, 11 busulfan) died after a median follow-up of 9.5 months. When the effects of the two conditioning regimens on were compared in 28 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, the engraftment times, acute and chronic graft versus host disease incidences, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome incidence were found to be similar in busulfan and treosulfan groups (all p>0.05). In addition, the estimated median progression-free survival (p=0.938) and overall survival (p=0.672) of the groups were similar. Treosulfan-fludarabine appears to be a conditioning regimen that can be used as an alternative to busulfan-cyclophosphamide. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the data in our study. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Medicine Science en_US
dc.department İnönü Üniversitesi en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster